On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:40:30 +0000 Bob Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > Win4Lin is only because my wife's bank uses some stupid software > > security dodad with explorer to allow on-line banking. My bank is a bit > > smarter.(Her bank? My bank? Such is Sweden. We also have "Our bank") > > No objections to Win4Lin. I've been thinking about getting it for > running my audio editing program. Does sound work? I think so. I seem to recall my daughter doing something. Keep in mind that device support under win4lin is less than linux direct. You cannot use windows drivers. I used the SCO unixware version (merge) and it allowed you to access quite a bit more of the hardware. I think the kernel stuff in the unixware version is better. But rather closed. > > I use ext3. I was once burned by ReiserFS. > > Not XFS? I have been toying with the idea. I will be making a /home partition. Maybe that could be XFS. What are the noticeable advantages? (I will have to leave this discussion mid-stream as I will be out of the office for a week or so. I still don't have imap set up the way I want here...) -- +============================+===============================+ | Roger Oberholtzer | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OPQ Systems AB | WWW: http://www.opq.se/ | | Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 | Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 | | 115 32 Stockholm | Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 | | Sweden | Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 | +============================+===============================+ _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
