I know lots of the problems with IDE burning is the CD and HD being on the same ribbon, as well as in direct CD2CD with the CDburner and CDreader on the same ribbon.
On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 18:56:05 -0500 - "Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following Re: Re: CD burner write speed and cdrecord >Ease of use as in install and administer the devices - put it in, >connect to a SCSI adapter and you're done. No messing with IRQs, etc., >you can have more than four devices on the SCSI bus. > >As for performance the SCSI ones probably (but I haven't bench marked >it so won't argure this one <G>.) run faster because SCSI is faster >then IDE and they don't make as many coasters. I can burn on SCSI and >do other things at the same time and not have problems. IDEs seem to >figure in a lot of the problems that I see. > >> On Thursday 05 December 2002 01:53 pm, Brett I. Holcomb espoused: >>> I got so I used SCSI for my workstations. It was worth the extra >cost to>> get the performance and ease of use. >> >> I have never had any better performance from scsi burners than from >ide,> as for ease of use they are no different. > >-- >Brett I. Holcomb >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >AKA Grunt <>< >Registered Linux User #188143 >Remove R777 to email >_______________________________________________ >Linux-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> >http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
