That someone was me, and that was an anomaly of some sort. I've never had problems outside of that one box.
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, m.w.chang wrote: > in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with > symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it mean an extra step to clear > all symlinks before buidling glibc? > > my last trial (on a fresh-install COL 3.1) was a failure.I could't > compile a thing after the upgrade procedure. > > Net Llama! wrote: > > Backup /lib before you start. If it all goes to hell, make sure you > > have something like Knoppix or the Linuxcare BBC ready so you can > > restore /lib. > > or that plan will work too. Just /lib needs to be restored. > > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
