> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, m.w.chang wrote:
> > in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with
> > symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it mean an extra step to clear
> > all symlinks before buidling glibc?
> >
> > my last trial (on a fresh-install COL 3.1) was a failure.I could't
> > compile a thing after the upgrade procedure.
> >
Upgrading to 2.2.5 was the easiest thing I ever did. Did you keep a compile log
so you could check and make sure it compiled properly?
--
******************************************************************************
Registered Linux User Number 185956
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
6:06pm up 18 days, 19:48, 2 users, load average: 0.05, 0.06, 0.07
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
