I've got it on my home lan and my personal lapop. We'll see just how good it is for that purpose... it is beta, but so far it looks ok. As for performance, it seems like all the previous builds.
Hmm... just got a message, 2.5.55 is now out for testting... gotta go. :') On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 10:32:45 -0500 (EST) Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its nice to know it build cleanly, but how does it run? I'd be quite > concerned about stability. > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Jerry McBride wrote: > > > > > It's been a while since I tried the 2.5.x kernel tree... and on a whim I > > grabbed a copy of the latest 2.5.54 tarball for something to do. > > > > Anyways, it configured and compiled without any extra fuss or hacking like > > some of the previous releases. All in all, it's feel pretty sweet. > > > > If you're looking for something to do... > > > > > > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> > http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ****************************************************************************** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net 12:29am up 1 day, 6:03, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
