On 01/09/03 16:38, Bill Campbell wrote:
I wouldn't. The argument that you referenced is one written by list admins for list admins, and intentionally ignores the needs of list members.On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:35:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Say, Doug, would you mind fixing the Reply-To: that Mailman puts on
messages to the list? Currently, it is Reply-To: General Linux discussion and help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is the same as the List-Id: header:
List-Id: General Linux discussion and help <linux-users.linux-sxs.org>
I would much prefer to see the Reply-To: left out entirely: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
4:50pm up 25 days, 23:58, 2 users, load average: 0.45, 0.88, 0.60
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
