On the one list I'm on where a reply-to goes to the sender instead of the list you have to anticipate getting at least eight out-of-office auto-replies and undeliverable mail notifications. And no one does anything about it, because it's more trouble than it's worth to deal with. On this list those things spam the list. So people complain, and wind up doing something.
At 04:54 PM 1/9/03 -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
On 01/09/03 16:38, Bill Campbell wrote:I wouldn't. The argument that you referenced is one written by list admins for list admins, and intentionally ignores the needs of list members.On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:35:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Say, Doug, would you mind fixing the Reply-To: that Mailman puts on
messages to the list? Currently, it is Reply-To: General Linux discussion and help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is the same as the List-Id: header:
List-Id: General Linux discussion and help <linux-users.linux-sxs.org>
I would much prefer to see the Reply-To: left out entirely: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stuart Biggerstaff
Linda Hall Library of Science Engineering & Technology
5109 Cherry St.
Kansas City, MO 64110
Phone: (816) 926-8748
(800) 662-1545 x748
FAX: (816) 926-8785
URL: www.lindahall.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
