On 01/13/03 18:27, Andrew Mathews wrote:
I'm confused. Is there any real functional change to the code, or is it just a reorg? I've been using the original 2.4.20 XFS patch since it came out, and haven't had any problems.Bruce Marshall wrote:Are there patches for the 2.4.20 kernel to add XFS?
I see the XFS says to start with 2.4.18 (and then mentions 2.4.14) but I just built a shiny-new 2.4.20 and would like to start there...
Not possible?
Funny you should ask. From the XFS mailing list this afternoon: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/2.4.20. The xfs patches for 2.4.20 have been respun as of 2003-01-14 00:43 UTC. For some time the XFS group have been producing split patches for XFS, separating the core XFS changes from additional patches such as kdb, xattr, acl, dmapi. The split patches are released to the world with the hope that developers and distributors will find them useful. Read the README in each directory very carefully, the split patch format has changed over a few kernel releases. Any questions that are covered by the README will be ignored. There is even a 2.4.21/README for the terminally impatient :).
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
6:30pm up 2:00, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.15, 0.34
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
