Problem.... There's no acpi patch for 2.4.21 on sourceforge

On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:04:27 -0700 Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ahhh...acpi has been known to be mostly broken in the vanilla 2.4.x 
> kernels.  From what i've read, in order to get useful acpi support, you 
> either need to go to 2.5.x or apply the acpi patch from acpi.sf.net.
> 
> On 06/14/03 09:43, Jerry McBride wrote:
> 
> > I'm using vanilla kernel source...
> > 
> > On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:09:44 -0700 Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> On 06/14/03 09:00, Jerry McBride wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Well... with all the talk about 2.4.21 on the net and this mail list...
> >I> > grabbed a copy and started fooling around. 
> >> > Other odd thing with 2.4.21, acpi or apm both fail to modprobe
> >horribly...> > I'm not able to cleanly shutdown-h without either power
> >manager loaded.> > Both compile cleanly... either as a dedicated service or
> >with both services> > in one kernel. Without a PM loaded... it's not good to
> >turn off the> > computyer when I'm done.
> >> 
> >> are you using the acpi that comes with 2.4.21, or the patch from 
> >> acpi.sf.net?
> >> 
> >> > I'd be willing to bet that 2.4.22 will be out in less time than 2.4.21
> >> > took... Any takers?
> >> 
> >> hard to say at this point, since i can't get it to build yet with XFS. 
> >> i'm taking a stab right now on my remaining ext3 box.
> 
> -- 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> L. Friedman                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:              http://netllama.ipfox.com
> 
>   10:00am  up 14 days, 18:14,  1 user,  load average: 0.46, 0.49, 0.57
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc ->
> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to