On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kurt Wall wrote: > > Is there any reason to keep the old version of gcc around, other than for > > the random stuff that still won't buld right on gcc-3.x? > > I'd keep it around until you're sure the new one works.
Do you know of a list of stuff that is known not to build with gcc-3.x? > <plug mode="shameless"> > If all else fails, see http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=187 > when it comes out. ;-) > </plug> I don't suppose it will be out later this afternoon, will it? ;) thanks Kurt. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
