On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kurt Wall wrote: > Quoth Net Llama!: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Kurt Wall wrote: > > > > Is there any reason to keep the old version of gcc around, other than for > > > > the random stuff that still won't buld right on gcc-3.x? > > > > > > I'd keep it around until you're sure the new one works. > > > > Do you know of a list of stuff that is known not to build with gcc-3.x? > > The kernel doesn't usually build with 3.3. I'm not aware of anything > else, but I just started playing with it.
Does the kernel build with 3.2? Is there anything that runs much faster/better when built with gcc-3.x? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
