On Monday 21 July 2003 08:33 am, Net Llama! wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote: > > On Monday 21 July 2003 08:02 am, Net Llama! wrote: <snip> > > > I've not run into any gcc specific problems since upgrading. Now > > > going to glibc-2.3.x is another story altogether (mucho > > > headaches). > > > > I've heard this is not pleasant. Why would I need to do this? > > Not to build gcc-3.x, no. However, alot of newer stuff is wanting > glibc-2.3.x. You *do* need gcc-3.x to build glibc-2.3.x though.
I think someone suggested buying a distro with glibc-2.3.x already built-in rather than trying to install it. -- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I'd Rather Be Sailing" _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
