On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 11:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found that installing RH9 cured the problems I experienced with RH8, which were very similar to what you describe. IMHO, RH8 was like the typical RH x.0 release and RH9 behaves more like a RHx.1 or x.2 release. IOW, RH9~=RH8.2.
I know that's probably not the answer you were looking for but it 'worked for me' ;o)
That may be the final outcome, but I'd rather try to 'fix' my way out of the issue first.
PS: Hi Myles :)
maybe build your own kernel?
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
2:15pm up 26 days, 16:56, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.33, 0.54
_______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
