Quoth Richard Thompson:
[deletia]
> An insanity defense makes a certain amount of sense. Perhaps, however,
> the recent lunatic ravings of Darl McBride to the SCO forum members that
> IBM is orchestrating the open source response to the SCO -v- IBM suit
> may have a less obvious purpose - a first strike to divert attention
> away from the puppeteers at Microsoft who are pulling SCO's strings,
> i.e. lie first, lie loud, lie often and repeatedly, and chances are good
> - well, you get the picture. Out of curiosity, except for a few reports
> of cash infusions for useless licenses and outdated tech, there seems to
> have been a fair amount of silence on the MS/SCO connection. Any ideas
> why?
Very little solid evidence on which to base an article. Suspicions
are strong but, just yet, there's nothing there there. With the spotlight
of anti-trust shining on them, Microsoft must move cautiously. They
will undoubtedly make a misstep sooner or later.
Kurt
--
If a 6600 used paper tape instead of core memory, it would use up tape
at about 30 miles/second.
-- Grishman, Assembly Language Programming
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
