Quoth Alma J Wetzker: > >Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:50:19 -0400 > > > >Yes, but what will the jury think? > >Joel > > > >On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 07:21:49PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote: > > > >>http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/smoking-fizzle.html > > That is the $3,000,000,000.00 question. It is a VERY safe bet that SCO > will remove any juror that uses a computer, let alone can read code. So > it all comes down to which expert witness is prettier.
Which pretty much removes ESR and RMS from the running. :-) That said, self-promotion notwithstanding, ESR is very good at making complex technical issues clear. However, this is not about complex _technical_ issues, but, rather, about IBM's alleged contract violoations. SCOs trial-by-press-release is calcualated attempt to cloud the core legal issue: did IBM subvert the contract or not? Kurt -- Entropy isn't what it used to be. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
