On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > > http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html > > > > This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its > > brethren. It smells no better when it comes from OSS. > > I see nothing wrong with it. How would you propose that the GPL be > enforced? > What I read from this is an interpretation of the GPL that could loosely be expressed as "what is mine is mine, what is yours is also mine." I personally don't believe that such an interpretation has any real benefit, although I'm certain that proponents of the GPL might disagree. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
