On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:34:16 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no interpretation. The GPL clearly & explicitly requires that > you release the source for your work, and all derrivitive works. The FSF > is enforcing that requirement. I'll ask again, how would you propose that > the GPL be enforced, if not via: > 0) Polite requests, then if ignored > 1) Less polite requests, then if still ignored > 2) Legal action > Right. If anyone takes the GPL source they also take the licence. Don't like the GPL? Don't use GPL'd software. Actually, some people winding up this situation, (vide Subject) when clearly it is at a reasonable, and debated level, is not helpful to the OSS and FSF positions. It helps create quotable "internal squabbles" arguments for those whose livelihoods depend on M$ continued monopoly of the market* ( *US government agreed). Terence _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
