It seems that mozilla's built-in bayesian filter works better than SpamAssassin. Until now, SA failed to identify many Chinese spam while mozilla can correctly move them into the Junk folder on reception.
> It's not *really* Bayesian - I don't think any of them are. They all ignore the > cross-correlation. That is, they don't correct for the fact that enlarge and > p...s frequently occur together, and sum the probabilities. To do it right > is hard. > > I used to run a "Bayesian" filter at work, until they disabled Unix e-mail > at the end of October, and it worked fairly well. -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust. / v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org /( _ )\ Linux 2.4.22-xfs ^ ^ 7:46pm up 4 days, 8:39, 1 user, load average: 1.02, 1.04, 1.04 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
