On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:34:36 -0600 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> M.W. Chang wrote: > > It seems that mozilla's built-in bayesian filter works better than > > SpamAssassin. Until now, SA failed to identify many Chinese spam while > > mozilla can correctly move them into the Junk folder on reception. > > I've been using Moz Firebird as my only email for quite some time now. > And have been somewhat disappointed in the filters. It catches alot of > the junk right away, but it doesn't seem to be learning. I get the same > spam from the same scammers every day and no matter how many times I > flag it as junk it continues to show up. But it is a 0.7 Beta so I don't > want to be critical of it, just hope they flesh it out in the near future. > Agrred. Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the once-and-future-browser, it would seem that improvements are to be expected. I've been using Firebird since it's early days, and it's quite good. Nevertheless, 0.7 has more of a propensity to "just go poof" (TM) than earlier versions; segfault I presume. Perhaps I should resume the practice of getting the CVS versions. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
