Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Question is, what standards should be adhered to? I woult think FHS (
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ ) would be common sense, as would be LSB (
> http://www.linuxbase.org/ ) just for starters. This needs a consensus
> before any package inclusion discussions.
That's got my vote. We, might as well make it as secure as possible
while we are at it.
I think a solid, well thought out build plan is called for.
--
burns
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
