Update: FWIW
DOS 6.22 *will* accept and execute "format a:/u"
DOS 7.0 (Windows 98) will *not* accept the above command.
Regards,
Glenn
On Monday 09 July 2001 11:00 am, you wrote:
> Hi, Mike:
>
> I respectfully disagree with you. For as many years as I have been
> using MS-DOS or PC-DOS, syntax has *required* a space between the
> command and any switch preceded by a forward slash.
>
> I just finished successfully formatting a floppy disk using this
> command:
>
> format a: /u
>
> The command:
>
> format/u
>
> produces the following: "Required parameter missing."
>
> and this variation:
>
> format\u
>
> produces: "Bad command or filename"
>
> I also checked this out in one of the two DOS manuals I still have
> left. I'll look in the other book as soon as I find it, but I have
> no reason to believe it will show anything different.
>
> Are you referring to some other flavor of DOS? Perhaps I overlooked
> something in the original message. If am am not talking about the
> same command or DOS or application as you, I apologize for butting
> in.
>
> Regards
>
> On Monday 09 July 2001 07:58 am, you wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 July 2001 00:49, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > Note that there needs to be a space between the 'unconditional'
> > > switch (u) and the format command, thus:
> > >
> > > format /u a:
> >
> > Nope, Dos parses differently to (ba)sh, no whitespace is
> > acceptable.
--
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User # 135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
