At 00:08 03/07/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Shawn Tayler wrote:
>
>>On 02 Jul 2001 08:30:26 -0700, Aaron Grewell wrote:
>>
>>>They probably didn't. Source obfuscation is a time-honored tradition in
>>>portscanning.
>>
>>Ah, but I got another tidbit on this today. Apparently I am not the
>>only person this has happened to. People are finding port scans on
>>1178 from Microsoft.Com the day after a Windows Online update is
>>executed on a regular basis. Anyone on the list have a Winblows box
>>behind a firewall they'd like to test my theory on?
>
>Ooooh. This is very interesting. I don't qualify, but I certainly would be
>interested in the results. Please keep me posted.
>
>--
>burns
*** So what's the latest news on this? I've been checking the logs but
didn't find any scans...
Cheers,
Zoran.
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
