--- Mike Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 August 2001 03:12, Net Llama wrote:
> > --- Mike Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > None of which are libstdc++.so, which is the file complained
> about.
> >
> > libstdc++ has libstdc++.so
>
> Sorry Camel, I don't follow what you mean
>
> you do NOT have *the* file
>
> libstdc++.so
>
> listed as being (part of) the rpm's you gave. So whatever and however
> it's on
> your system, if it's on your system, it isn't from *those* rpm's.
>
> as you know? -lstdc++ is a shortform for the above
>
> and the above is generally always a symlink to the real .so under the
> hammer.
>
> have you tried a simple locate?
3.<netllama@hal_netllama> locate libstdc++.so
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/libstdc++.so
Any other ideas?
=====
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux FAQ & Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com
.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
