It would only show up on the FW internal interface, and I thought he said
that this was on the external.
"Wil McGilvery"
<wmcgilvery@lync To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
h.ca> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: Firewall log
192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535
linux-users-admi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/21/01 10:42
AM
Please respond
to linux-users
I have also seen multihomed machines with improperly configured proxies or
firewalls be identified by their internal address. This might also be what
is happening here.
Regards,
Wil McGilvery
Manager, Digital Media
Lynch Technologies Inc.
416-744-7191
1-888-622-3729
416-744-0406 FAX
www.lynchdigital.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535
My suspicion is that we on the @HOME network are in reality on a private
network where those 192 ip's can be used. I think that would be possible
but
I am just guessing.
Joel
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users