Quoting Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My suspicion is that we on the @HOME network are in reality on a > private > network where those 192 ip's can be used. I think that would be possible > but > I am just guessing. > Joel Good guess then. You are correct (unless they have changed things). I remember with one of my previous IP addys assigned from @home, I was able to run traceroutes and see 10.#.#.#'s on the way through various segments onto the internet. -- Linux SxS [http://members.home.net/linuxsteps/ _______________________________________________ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
- Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Joel Hammer
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Ian Marchak
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Ronnie Gauthier
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Marianne Taylor
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:6... Ronnie Gauthier
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Matt . Carpenter
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Matt . Carpenter
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Joel Hammer
- RE: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Wil McGilvery
- RE: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Matt . Carpenter
- Re: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Matt . Carpenter
- RE: Firewall log 192.168.100.1:65535 224.0.0.1:65535 Wil McGilvery