Keith Antione wrote:
> On Monday 19 November 2001 02:54, Susan Macchia enunciated:
> > I was running the full version (evaulation copy) and used the wizard to
> > create the vm.  4G disk (which I could change, but left it).
>
> The nice part about it is that although you created a 4gig file its only
> takes on the size of the loaded files, elastic partitioning <g>. Yes I left
> it at 4gig too as I am almost at the stage whereby I seldom use it.
> Know of any good linux rippers (mpeg) and anything to take the place of
> FlaskMpeg ?

Nope - haven't fooled around with mpeg files yet.

>
> > Regarding the com ports, I find that have to uninstall/re-install them
> > after powering them down.  Wierd.  I can live w/ it for a while since I
> > don't use it to sync my palm or download from my camera very often.  At
> > some point I will have to figure out what the issue is and determine if its
> > a bug or what.
>
> Now thats is wierd, as I am on cable it sees out on the net and also ses the
> local files on linux on boot. I used to use it with early version 2.0 with a
> modem, it was fine.

Well, I have a cable modem, but use the serial port to sync my palm and for my
camera.  On windows, only use it for the palm when I need to update the
Daytimer addressbook.  I checked permissions on /dev/ttyS0 and they were ok. 
So at some point I'll have to figure out whats happenin' here.

>
> > Regarding your writer (and mine).  I went to the vmware website and found
> > that they don't support burners, but treat them as readers only.  I can see
> > both my reader (/dev/hdc) and my writer (/dev/ttyS0).  The writer is scsi
> > emulated, but both are really ide.
>
> Well thyey are really Atapi-Scsi to start off with not really ide, however I
> thought that , that would be the case. I can burn on Suse but I do like Nero
> and burning VCD's is in its infancy with linux but doable (all command line)
>
> > I still haven't decided whether to fork up the $ for the full version or to
> > go with the express, since I may not need win2k.  But I do think that I am
> > going to give up on Win4Lin...
>
> Did you miss out on the $89.00 special offer some months ago; yes I agree on
> win4lin, its to messy and no where as professional to vmware. BTW did you
> donload the full manual in pdf format ? quite extensive..........

Bummer, I missed it.  I was running RH 7.0 with win4lin so didn't need to try
anything else until my switch to SuSE.  Don't think I'll go back though.  It
would be nice if they had a single user single instance license of 3.0 like the
2.0 express.  I'd really like to keep win2k because I need to use Word for the
occasions when my boss ships me an Office2k .doc file that I need to read or
update (like our software project plan).  


=====
_____________________________
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to