On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 21:46:42 -0800, Derek Blazer wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.  I have tried to provide additional info below:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anita Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> You might try running the cdrom as a rescue disk to see what is
> happening.
>> I know you can do that with the RH disk.  Boot it and then do 'linux
> rescue'
>> That will start linux in ram.  Then do
>> 'fdisk -l /dev/hda' and write down what that looks like.
> 
> I don't understand how I can use a linux disk as a rescue disk for
> windows.

Actually, you should be able to do this and see what the hard drive looks
like from linux.  I misunderstood and thought you had installed, but when
you booted you got that message.  You are getting it when you attempt to
install.  My hope is that by running the linux rescue and then that fdisk
command, you will see what the hard drive looks like.  It may not be
accessible or there may not be any unpartitioned space.  I'm not sure what
kind of message that would give, but I thought a look at it while using a
linux kernel in RAM would be helpful information.  

If you get that error when you run 'linux rescue' then the problem is with
loading a root filesystem into RAM.  I may have the terminology wrong, but
that's the general idea.  I just finished installing slackware on a laptop
with 4Mb RAM and using floppies.  First there was the boot floppy with the
kernel and then a root floppy which put a filesystem into RAM.  I think that
is what happens with the install from cdrom too.  You have plenty of RAM; so
I'm interested to see what happens with trying to run the cdrom as a rescue
disk.  RH does this and perhaps other distros do too.  

Anita
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to