On 19/03/12 21:25, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > The very first thing you do is crank up dmidecode, studying the output > of the "physical memory array" section. This will clear up whether to > return it as a fraud, or to wonder what might have gobbled up the > missing storage. Shared video ram is a prime contender, but 256M of it > for such an Eeeeee non-computer seems rather excessive. There might be > more than one guilty party of course.
Reading the output now. (I've also attached the output for anyone willing to help interpret it.) :) --Aidan
1015BXO.dmi.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
_______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
