On 19/03/12 21:25, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > The very first thing you do is crank up dmidecode, studying the output > of the "physical memory array" section. This will clear up whether to > return it as a fraud, or to wonder what might have gobbled up the > missing storage. Shared video ram is a prime contender, but 256M of it > for such an Eeeeee non-computer seems rather excessive. There might be > more than one guilty party of course.
Looks as if there actually is 1GB in there, looking at line 396 (entry starting at line 391). Since the graphics card has "HD" in the name, and 256VRAM is low end by today's standards, I wouldn't be surprised if it is, indeed, reserved for video. I can't find anything telling in the "physical memory array" section, though. --Aidan _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
