On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > tolerable glyph variation. Because the glyph which is shown in the > Unicode PDF files is a concrete one glyph, it cannot express the range > of tolerable glyph variation. Since U+FA45 is commented in the Unicode
Just FYI, attached is a png image I got from ISO 10646-1:2000 for U+6D77. Five glyphs shown are for TC, SC, J, K and V. J glyph is noticably different (although within the tolerance limit of CJK Unification). from the rest. Actually, this doesn't give any new information because TUS 3.0 does list two glyphs for U+6D77 (one in the code chart and the other in CJK index) as Thomas pointed out. Jungshik Shin
sea_u+67dd.png
Description: glyphs for U+67DD in ISO 10646-1:2000
