On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Danilo Segan wrote: > > > I agree with you, and though I haven't thoroughly read the manpage, I'm > > pretty sure that gcc does this. gcc is, as far as I see, the one and only > > gnu project that is maintained correctly and the developers know where > > they're going, they have systematic testing, release plans, working > > bugtracking system and stuff like that. I trust them that they're not so > > crazy to completely break everything. > > That's a pretty harsh statement. I, for one, know many GNU projects > which are "maintained correctly" and for which "developers know where > they're going".
Okay... I emphasize "as far as I see" again... which means that they communicate these things to the world outside... And GNU project does not mean every project released under the GPL. It means projects officially adopted by the FSF GNU team or whosoever. Actually, I don't know if Gnome is an official GNU project, if it is, then it may be another one... And there might be other ones which I'm not aware of or I just happened to forget them. But really sorry again for this close-to-flame and offtopic sentence. I'm curious what projects you think of, maybe in private since it's really offtopic here. Sorry once again... -- Egmont -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
