Markus Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Florian Weimer wrote on 2000-08-09 06:59 UTC: > > Some time ago, you strongly advocated for UTF-16. > > When and where? Admittedly, I predicted in the original utf8 manpage > that sizeof(wchar_t) == 2 on Linux, Sorry, I seems as I've misinterpreted some messages from you written back in October in which you said that anything beyond the BMP is only interesting to scholars. > STIX math proposal Are there any ideas yet how to modify the tools nowadays used by mathematicians to work according to this proposal? - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Ping Yeh
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Florian Weimer
- RE: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Robert Brady
- RE: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Nuesser, Wilhelm
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Ulrich Drepper
- RE: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Bruno Haible
