On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Edward H Trager wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Jungshik Shin wrote: > > > Edward Cherlin wrote: > > > > >On Sunday 30 March 2003 11:25 pm, Jungshik Shin wrote: > > > > > > > > >> I'm also gonna explore > > >>if it's easier to wed 'pango' with Mozilla if gtk2 instead > > >>of gtk is used. That would dramatically improve complex script > > >>handling of Mozilla if possible. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >Have you looked at SILA? It uses SIL Graphite as the renderer for > > >Mozilla. > > > > > >http://sila.mozdev.org/ > > > > > > > > Yup. I'm aware of it. At least for now it's only for Windows, though. > > However, we may get some valuable insights from the project that can be > > applicatble to 'Mozilla-pango' marriage. > > > > Jungshik > > Can Jungshik or someone else please clarify for me what Mozilla 1.3 > currently uses for complex script rendering? I'm seeing differences in > rendering of Thai on Linux (horrible) vs. in Windows (OK) in Mozilla 1.3. > The graphite web site says their goal is to provide complex script > rendering "on the Windows platform". If SIL Graphite is Windows-only, > does that mean Mozilla uses something else on Linux than it does on > Windows? I forgot to mention that one possibility is certainly a lack of adequate fonts in my default Linux installation(s): I am investigating this. > > > > > > > -- > > Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels > > Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/ > > > > -- > Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels > Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/ > -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
