Hi Andreas, On Wednesday 29 August 2007, Andreas Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I got my webcam working with WengoPhone [1] now. The strange thing is > that it reports RGB565 as supported format. > > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode WebcamDriver::setDevice(const > std::string&): desired device=UVC Camera (046d:08c9) : video1, actual > device=UVC Camera (046d:08c9) : video1 > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > V4L2WebcamDriver::setDevice(const std::string&): Setting '/dev/video1' > device. > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > V4L2WebcamDriver::setDevice(const std::string&): Device properly resolved. > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > WebcamDriver::setResolution(unsigned int, unsigned int): try to change > resolution: (width, height)=320,240 > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > V4L2WebcamDriver::setPalette(pixosi): Trying to change webcam > pixelformat to yuv420p (0) > (warn) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > V4L2WebcamDriver::setPalette(pixosi): Failed settings pixel format. > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > V4L2WebcamDriver::setPalette(pixosi): Webcam pixelformat is rgb565 (9) > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > WebcamDriver::setPalette(pixosi): this webcam does not support palette #0 > (debug) 11:07:48 virtual WebcamErrorCode > WebcamDriver::setPalette(pixosi): palette conversion will be forced > > I thought the driver/webcam supports only MJPEG and YUYV.
All the UVC webcams I know about support MJPEG and YUYV only. Wengophone might have a low-level MJPEG/YUV to RGB565 filter somewhere that makes the application think the webcam streams RGB565 data. In any case, you shouldn't worry about it. Best regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
