On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:26:28 +0800, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tom, > > On Monday 24 September 2007, Tom St wrote: >> Hello Listmembers, Hello Laurent, >> What about the idea to add another column to the list of supported >> devices, which shows some kind of ranking like: >> >> * works for most users (++), >> * some issues (+), >> * no issues reported (+++)? >> >> Would also be an idea to have such a list in the wiki and include hints >> for workarounds like "initialize audio modules first, then load video >> modules" for certain webcams. >> >> What do you think? > > The boundary between "works for most users" and "some issues" is > difficult to > define. I added a "Status" column to the supported devices list. The > device > is either supported (green check mark) or supported with some issues the > user > should be aware of (warning sign with footnote links). > > Please let me know what you think of this new supported devices list. Good list! A few small comments: 1. The camera with VID/PID 046C/09B0 is based on the Sonix SN9C21x chip and isn't affected by the bugs. I think it deserves a green checkmark. :-) 2. Your list is missing some Logitech cameras. You may want to sync it with this one: http://www.quickcamteam.net/hcl/linux/logitech-webcams 3. There's some information on the mentioned Logitech hardware bug here: http://www.quickcamteam.net/documentation/faq/logitech-webcam-linux-usb-incompatibilities Would you mind adding the link to footnote 1 in your device compatibility list? Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
