Hi Martin, On Friday 28 September 2007, Martin Rubli wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:26:28 +0800, Laurent Pinchart > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Monday 24 September 2007, Tom St wrote: > >> Hello Listmembers, Hello Laurent, > >> What about the idea to add another column to the list of supported > >> devices, which shows some kind of ranking like: > >> > >> * works for most users (++), > >> * some issues (+), > >> * no issues reported (+++)? > >> > >> Would also be an idea to have such a list in the wiki and include hints > >> for workarounds like "initialize audio modules first, then load video > >> modules" for certain webcams. > >> > >> What do you think? > > > > The boundary between "works for most users" and "some issues" is > > difficult to > > define. I added a "Status" column to the supported devices list. The > > device > > is either supported (green check mark) or supported with some issues the > > user > > should be aware of (warning sign with footnote links). > > > > Please let me know what you think of this new supported devices list. > > Good list! A few small comments: > > 1. The camera with VID/PID 046C/09B0 is based on the Sonix SN9C21x chip > and isn't affected by the bugs. I think it deserves a green checkmark. :-) > > 2. Your list is missing some Logitech cameras. You may want to sync it > with this one: > http://www.quickcamteam.net/hcl/linux/logitech-webcams
Product 046c:09b0 has been reported to work. You can update your list :-) > 3. There's some information on the mentioned Logitech hardware bug here: > http://www.quickcamteam.net/documentation/faq/logitech-webcam-linux-usb-inc >ompatibilities Would you mind adding the link to footnote 1 in your device > compatibility list? Thanks for the information. I updated the website. I'll upload the new version when Berlios will be back :-/ Cheers, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
