> +++ b/net/mac80211/rate.h
> @@ -37,11 +37,15 @@ static inline void rate_control_tx_status(struct 
> ieee80211_local *local,
>       struct rate_control_ref *ref = local->rate_ctrl;
>       struct ieee80211_sta *ista = &sta->sta;
>       void *priv_sta = sta->rate_ctrl_priv;
> +     struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
>  
>       if (!ref || !test_sta_flag(sta, WLAN_STA_RATE_CONTROL))
>               return;
>  
> -     ref->ops->tx_status(ref->priv, sband, ista, priv_sta, skb);
> +     if (ref->ops->tx_status)
> +             ref->ops->tx_status(ref->priv, sband, ista, priv_sta, skb);
> +     else
> +             ref->ops->tx_status_noskb(ref->priv, sband, ista, priv_sta, 
> info);

I can't say I like this - you're going to have to pass NULL or something
as the SKB pointer, and then rely on having a rate control algorithm
that deals with it, etc....

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to