> /**
> + * ieee80211_tx_status_noskb - transmit status callback without skb
> + *
> + * This function can be used as a replacement for ieee80211_tx_status
> + * in drivers that cannot reliably map tx status information back to
> + * specific skbs.
> + *
> + * This function may not be called in IRQ context. Calls to this function
> + * for a single hardware must be synchronized against each other. Calls
> + * to this function, ieee80211_tx_status_ni() and
> ieee80211_tx_status_irqsafe()
> + * may not be mixed for a single hardware. Must not run concurrently with
> + * ieee80211_rx() or ieee80211_rx_ni().
None of that seems very likely. Did you just copy/paste it? :)
> +static inline void
> +rate_control_tx_status_noskb(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> + struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
> + struct sta_info *sta,
> + struct ieee80211_tx_info *info)
> +{
> + struct rate_control_ref *ref = local->rate_ctrl;
> + struct ieee80211_sta *ista = &sta->sta;
> + void *priv_sta = sta->rate_ctrl_priv;
> +
> + if (!ref || !test_sta_flag(sta, WLAN_STA_RATE_CONTROL))
> + return;
> +
> + ref->ops->tx_status_noskb(ref->priv, sband, ista, priv_sta, info);
> +}
Oh, so you're adding another one ... I guess I understand better now.
> +
> +
two blank lines?
> -static void ieee80211_lost_packet(struct sta_info *sta, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static void ieee80211_lost_packet(struct sta_info *sta,
> + struct ieee80211_tx_info *info)
> {
> - struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
> -
some of this refactoring might better be in a separate patch.
> /* This packet was aggregated but doesn't carry status info */
> if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) &&
> !(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU))
> @@ -571,24 +570,13 @@ static void ieee80211_lost_packet(struct sta_info *sta,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> sta->lost_packets = 0;
> }
>
> -void ieee80211_tx_status(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int ieee80211_tx_get_rates(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> + struct ieee80211_tx_info *info,
> + int *retry_count)
> {
> - struct sk_buff *skb2;
> - struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *) skb->data;
> - struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw);
> - struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
> - __le16 fc;
> - struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
> - struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
> - struct net_device *prev_dev = NULL;
> - struct sta_info *sta, *tmp;
> - int retry_count = -1, i;
> int rates_idx = -1;
> - bool send_to_cooked;
> - bool acked;
> - struct ieee80211_bar *bar;
> - int rtap_len;
> - int shift = 0;
> + int count = -1;
> + int i;
ditto - too big for here.
> + acked = !!(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK);
> + if (pubsta) {
> + struct sta_info *sta;
> +
> + sta = container_of(pubsta, struct sta_info, sta);
> +
> + if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STATUS_EOSP)
> + clear_sta_flag(sta, WLAN_STA_SP);
That doesn't seem reasonable really - if you're reporting out of band
then don't report it as TX status but rather with the eosp() call.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
