On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:18 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > Add a comment indicating that the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104 case falls > through to the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 case in iwl_mvm_send_sta_key. > This will document that the lack of a break is intentional. > > Coverity: CID 1260023 > > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]> > --- > This seems to work, so I'm guessing that the fall-through is > intentional...
Yeah, it is. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
