On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:18 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> Add a comment indicating that the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104 case falls
> through to the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 case in iwl_mvm_send_sta_key.
> This will document that the lack of a break is intentional.
>
> Coverity: CID 1260023
>
> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
> ---
> This seems to work, so I'm guessing that the fall-through is
> intentional...
>
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c
> index d86fe432e51f..c0fc4fc0161b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c
> @@ -1196,6 +1196,7 @@ static int iwl_mvm_send_sta_key(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
> break;
> case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104:
> key_flags |= cpu_to_le16(STA_KEY_FLG_WEP_13BYTES);
> + /* fall through */
> case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40:
> key_flags |= cpu_to_le16(STA_KEY_FLG_WEP);
> memcpy(cmd.key + 3, keyconf->key, keyconf->keylen);
Applied - thanks.
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{��*ޕ�,�{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w���
���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
