On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:45 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:35 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > iw also wasn't helpful: > > Frequencies: > > * 5180 MHz [36] (30.0 dBm) > > * 5200 MHz [40] (30.0 dBm) > > * 5220 MHz [44] (30.0 dBm) > > * 5240 MHz [48] (30.0 dBm) > > > > After some in-kernel debugging (nl80211_set_wiphy, > > cfg80211_chandef_usable, cfg80211_secondary_chans_ok) I finally > > realized it was because of: > > IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_80MHZ > > > > Do you have any idea how we could handle such cases nicely? To let > > user find out what's going on (wrong)? > > > > Should "iw" be extended to print flag names? Or should hostapd check > > for channels in some smarter way? Any other ideas? > > We already have the flags exposed to iw, it's just not printing them. > There was a patch to print them, but it wasn't complete, and the > submitter kinda went away. You can see the discussion here: > > http://mid.gmane.org/1425452686-28196-1-git-send-email-arnag...@qti.qualcomm.com
Upon rereading, I think my preference would be to remove much of the channel list information and add a separate iw command. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
