On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Johannes Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 20:02 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote: > >> > i don't see any issues in the powersave w.r.t driver. Isn't it a >> > valid case? you meant implementing dynamic_ps? > > No, I really did mean implementing the entire PS logic in the driver, > instead of having mac80211 do it. > >> If it advertise HW_SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_PS it works fine. >> so may be we should queue those frames and send it to >> HW once it is out of powersave? > > We could, but I *really* don't want to patch over the messy and broken > powersave code in mac80211 now. > > I really do think that the only way out of this mess is to implement > powersave entirely outside of mac80211; perhaps mac80211 could provide > helpers for it, but tying it into the MLME implementation and having > all the PS-Poll stuff be global etc. is simply wrong today. Okay, i understand. This again points to our discussion about mac80211 ps a while ago. May be we should document this somewhere so that device driver developers are aware of this?
-- Thanks, Regards, Chaitanya T K. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
