On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 14:29 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 20-9-2016 13:45, Beker, Ayala wrote:
> > I don't think there is something in common to those interface types
> > that can fit such a function semantically, so I decided not to
> > change it.
> > Do you have any idea?
> What is common is that these are both non-netdev interface types.
I tend to agree with you. I also thought about an
ieee80211_has_netdev() function for this, but I didn't check whether
this was exactly what we need...
In any case, do you mind if we address this in a separate patch?