On 20-9-2016 16:36, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Hi Arend,
> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 14:29 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 20-9-2016 13:45, Beker, Ayala wrote:
>>> I don't think there is something in common to those interface types
>>> that can fit such a function semantically, so I decided not to
>>> change it.
>>> Do you have any idea?
>> What is common is that these are both non-netdev interface types.
> I tend to agree with you. I also thought about an
> ieee80211_has_netdev() function for this, but I didn't check whether
> this was exactly what we need...
Maybe it does not fit all instances, but quite a few checks are there to
skip netdev related stuff.
> In any case, do you mind if we address this in a separate patch?
Fine by me.