On 03/29/2017 01:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 16:26 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
From: Ben Greear <[email protected]>

This makes it easier to understand why wmediumd (or similar)
is getting errors when sending frames to the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c | 55
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
index 234df8c..84dcddf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
@@ -137,6 +137,12 @@ static int regtest = HWSIM_REGTEST_DISABLED;
 module_param(regtest, int, 0444);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(regtest, "The type of regulatory test we want to
run");

+DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(hwsim_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);
+int hwsim_ratelimit(void)
+{
+       return __ratelimit(&hwsim_ratelimit_state);
+}
+
 static const char *hwsim_alpha2s[] = {
        "FI",
        "AL",
@@ -1649,7 +1655,7 @@ static int mac80211_hwsim_config(struct
ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 changed)

        if (conf->chandef.chan)
                wiphy_debug(hw->wiphy,
-                           "%s (freq=%d(%d - %d)/%s idle=%d ps=%d
smps=%s)\n",
+                           "%s (chandef-chan freq=%d(%d - %d)/%s
idle=%d ps=%d smps=%s)\n",
                            __func__,
                            conf->chandef.chan->center_freq,
                            conf->chandef.center_freq1,
@@ -1660,7 +1666,7 @@ static int mac80211_hwsim_config(struct
ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 changed)
                            smps_modes[conf->smps_mode]);
        else
                wiphy_debug(hw->wiphy,
-                           "%s (freq=0 idle=%d ps=%d smps=%s)\n",
+                           "%s (no-chandef-chan freq=0 idle=%d
ps=%d smps=%s)\n",

This seems unrelated?

It can be cut out of the patch.  Want me to re-send?

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

Reply via email to