On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Xinming Hu <huxinming...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Xinming Hu <h...@marvell.com>
>
> Sanity check of interrupt number in interrupt handler is unnecessary and
> confusion, remove it.
I'd reworded the explanation a bit: "If wakeup interrupt handler is
called, we know that the wakeup interrupt number is valid, there is no
need to check it."
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <d...@chromium.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <h...@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akar...@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c
> index 30f4994..5e82602 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c
> @@ -1503,11 +1503,9 @@ static irqreturn_t mwifiex_irq_wakeup_handler(int irq,
> void *priv)
> {
> struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter = priv;
>
> - if (adapter->irq_wakeup >= 0) {
> - dev_dbg(adapter->dev, "%s: wake by wifi", __func__);
> - adapter->wake_by_wifi = true;
> - disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> - }
> + dev_dbg(adapter->dev, "%s: wake by wifi", __func__);
> + adapter->wake_by_wifi = true;
> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
>
> /* Notify PM core we are wakeup source */
> pm_wakeup_event(adapter->dev, 0);
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
