On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org> wrote:
> Hi Amitkumar,
>
>> Redpine bluetooth driver is a thin driver which depends on
>> 'rsi_91x' driver for transmitting and receiving packets
>> to/from device. It creates hci interface when attach() is
>> called from 'rsi_91x' module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Prameela Rani Garnepudi <prameela.j0...@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Siva Rebbagondla <siva.rebbagon...@redpinesignals.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.kar...@redpinesignals.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig | 12 ++
>> drivers/bluetooth/Makefile | 2 +
>> drivers/bluetooth/btrsi.c | 268
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/bluetooth/rsi_hci.h | 51 +++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 333 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/bluetooth/btrsi.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/bluetooth/rsi_hci.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
>> index 60e1c7d..ca58d74 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
>> @@ -378,4 +378,16 @@ config BT_QCOMSMD
>> Say Y here to compile support for HCI over Qualcomm SMD into the
>> kernel or say M to compile as a module.
>>
>> +config BT_RSI
>> + tristate "Redpine HCI support"
>> + depends on BT && BT_RFCOMM
>
> the depends on BT_RFCOMM is wrong. And even the depends on BT is unneeded
> since that is already covered with the above menu clause.
>
>
>> + default m
>
> No. New drivers are by default off.
We made it by default on, as RSI core module depends on this.
>
>> + help
>> + Redpine BT driver.
>> + This driver handles BT traffic from upper layers and pass
>> + to the RSI_91x coex module for further scheduling to device
>> +
>> + Say Y here to compile support for HCI over Qualcomm SMD into the
>> + kernel or say M to compile as a module.
>> +
>
> What I am missing is the depends on the RSI core piece that is needed.
Actually RSI core module depends on RSI BT module as per our design.
As soon as firmware is downloaded by RSI core module, we get WLAN and
BT card ready frames from firmware. BT initialization has to happen at
this point. So btrsi module should be loaded first.
>
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
>> index 4e4e44d..712af83a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
>> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BT_QCA) += btqca.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_NOKIA) += hci_nokia.o
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_BT_RSI) += btrsi.o
>> +
>> btmrvl-y := btmrvl_main.o
>> btmrvl-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += btmrvl_debugfs.o
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btrsi.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btrsi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c52f418
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btrsi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
>> +/**
>> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Redpine Signals Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
>> + * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>> + * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>> + *
>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
>> + * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
>> +e* ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
>> + * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
>> + * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
>> + * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/version.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include "rsi_hci.h"
>> +
>> +static struct rsi_mod_ops rsi_bt_ops = {
>> + .attach = rsi_hci_attach,
>> + .detach = rsi_hci_detach,
>> + .recv_pkt = rsi_hci_recv_pkt,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int rsi_hci_open(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>> +{
>> + BT_INFO("%s open\n", hdev->name);
>
> No BT_INFO here. We are not spamming dmesg with pointless information. And
> this applies to all of these.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rsi_hci_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>> +{
>> + BT_INFO("%s closed\n", hdev->name);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rsi_hci_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>> +{
>> + BT_ERR("%s flush\n", hdev->name);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rsi_hci_send_pkt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + struct rsi_hci_adapter *h_adapter;
>
> = hci_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> There is no need to do that separate.
>
>> + struct sk_buff *new_skb = NULL;
>> +
>> + int status = 0;
>> +
>> + h_adapter = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>> + if (!h_adapter) {
>> + status = -EFAULT;
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
>
> And this error check seems unneeded since the Bluetooth core will never call
> ->send unless it is all correctly set up.
>
>> +
>> + if (h_adapter->fsm_state != RSI_BT_FSM_DEVICE_READY) {
>> + BT_INFO("BT Device not ready\n");
>> + status = -ENODEV;
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
>
> Why are we registering a HCI device that might not be ready. This will be a
> massive bug in the whole system. Also one that is not recoverable. If
> something goes wrong, then lets unregister the HCI device.
>
>> +
>> + if (!test_bit(HCI_RUNNING, &hdev->flags)) {
>> + status = -EBUSY;
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
>
> This should no longer be needed. We moved this into the core and besides some
> old USB drivers, nobody is using this anymore.
>
>> +
>> + switch (bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type) {
>> + case HCI_COMMAND_PKT:
>> + hdev->stat.cmd_tx++;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case HCI_ACLDATA_PKT:
>> + hdev->stat.acl_tx++;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case HCI_SCODATA_PKT:
>> + hdev->stat.sco_tx++;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>
> Don’t use dev_kfree_skb() here. I think the Bluetooth subsystem is not ready
> for that.
>
>> + status = -EILSEQ;
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (skb_headroom(skb) < RSI_HEADROOM_FOR_BT_HAL) {
>> + /* Re-allocate one more skb with sufficent headroom */
>> + /* Space for Descriptor (16 bytes) is required in head room */
>> + u16 new_len = skb->len + RSI_HEADROOM_FOR_BT_HAL;
>> +
>> + new_skb = dev_alloc_skb(new_len);
>> + if (!new_skb) {
>> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + skb_reserve(new_skb, RSI_HEADROOM_FOR_BT_HAL);
>> + skb_put(new_skb, skb->len);
>> + memcpy(new_skb->data, skb->data, skb->len);
>> + bt_cb(new_skb)->pkt_type = bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type;
>> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>> + skb = new_skb;
>
> Just allocate a new skb with proper headroom. The data part can be shared.
> Doing this fully manual is just a bad idea.
>
> I also get the feeling that long term we want to change the Bluetooth drivers
> to specify the required SKB headroom so that they always get SKBs that are
> large enough for their needs.
>
>> + }
>> + if (h_adapter->proto_ops->coex_send_pkt)
>> + return h_adapter->proto_ops->coex_send_pkt(h_adapter->priv,
>> skb,
>> + RSI_BT_Q);
>
> This is worrisome. You need to send. If this callback is not available, then
> better not register the HCI device at all.
>
>> +
>> +fail:
>> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>> + return status;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int rsi_hci_recv_pkt(void *priv, u8 *pkt)
>> +{
>> + struct rsi_hci_adapter *h_adapter = (struct rsi_hci_adapter *)priv;
>> + struct hci_dev *hdev = NULL;
>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>> + int pkt_len = (le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)pkt)) & 0x0fff;
>> + u8 queue_no = (le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)pkt) & 0x7000) >> 12;
>
> We have get_unaligned_le16 helpers for this.
>
>> +
>> + if (h_adapter->fsm_state != RSI_BT_FSM_DEVICE_READY) {
>> + BT_INFO("BT Device not ready\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> Why call this function if the device is not ready? Can that not be checked
> and the HCI device not be registered.
>
>> +
>> + if (queue_no == RSI_BT_MGMT_Q) {
>> + u8 msg_type = pkt[14] & 0xFF;
>> +
>> + switch (msg_type) {
>> + case RSI_RESULT_CONFIRM:
>> + BT_INFO("BT Result Confirm\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + case RSI_BT_BER:
>> + BT_INFO("BT Ber\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + case RSI_BT_CW:
>> + BT_INFO("BT CW\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> How noisy is this? Also no \n required for the BT_INFO functions. And here
> bt_dev_info is preferred anyway.
>
>> +
>> + skb = dev_alloc_skb(pkt_len);
>> + if (!skb)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + hdev = h_adapter->hdev;
>> + memcpy(skb->data, pkt + RSI_FRAME_DESC_SIZE, pkt_len);
>> + skb_put(skb, pkt_len);
>> + h_adapter->hdev->stat.byte_rx += skb->len;
>> +
>> + skb->dev = (void *)hdev;
>> + bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = pkt[14];
>> +
>> + return hci_recv_frame(hdev, skb);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rsi_hci_recv_pkt);
>> +
>> +int rsi_hci_attach(void *priv, struct rsi_proto_ops *ops)
>> +{
>> + struct rsi_hci_adapter *h_adapter = NULL;
>> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
>> + int status = 0;
>> +
>> + h_adapter = kzalloc(sizeof(*h_adapter), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!h_adapter)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + h_adapter->priv = priv;
>> + ops->set_bt_context(priv, h_adapter);
>> + h_adapter->proto_ops = ops;
>> + ops->bt_ops = &rsi_bt_ops;
>> + h_adapter->fsm_state = RSI_BT_FSM_DEVICE_READY;
>> +
>> + hdev = hci_alloc_dev();
>> + if (!hdev) {
>> + BT_ERR("Failed to alloc HCI device\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + h_adapter->hdev = hdev;
>> +
>> + if (ops->get_host_intf(priv) == RSI_HOST_INTF_SDIO)
>> + hdev->bus = HCI_SDIO;
>> + else
>> + hdev->bus = HCI_USB;
>> +
>> + hci_set_drvdata(hdev, h_adapter);
>> + hdev->dev_type = HCI_PRIMARY;
>> + hdev->open = rsi_hci_open;
>> + hdev->close = rsi_hci_close;
>> + hdev->flush = rsi_hci_flush;
>> + hdev->send = rsi_hci_send_pkt;
>> +
>> + status = hci_register_dev(hdev);
>> + if (status < 0) {
>> + BT_ERR("%s: HCI registration failed with errcode %d\n",
>> + __func__, status);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + BT_INFO("%s interface created\n", hdev->name);
>> +
>> + h_adapter->fsm_state = RSI_BT_FSM_DEVICE_READY;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + if (hdev) {
>> + hci_unregister_dev(hdev);
>> + hci_free_dev(hdev);
>> + h_adapter->hdev = NULL;
>> + }
>> + kfree(h_adapter);
>> +
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void rsi_hci_detach(void *priv)
>> +{
>> + struct rsi_hci_adapter *h_adapter = (struct rsi_hci_adapter *)priv;
>> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
>> +
>> + if (!h_adapter)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + hdev = h_adapter->hdev;
>> +
>> + BT_INFO("Detaching %s\n", hdev->name);
>> +
>> + if (hdev) {
>> + hci_unregister_dev(hdev);
>> + hci_free_dev(hdev);
>> + h_adapter->hdev = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(h_adapter);
>> + h_adapter->fsm_state = RSI_BT_FSM_DEVICE_NOT_READY;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct rsi_mod_ops *rsi_get_hci_ops(void)
>> +{
>> + return &rsi_bt_ops;
>> +};
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rsi_get_hci_ops);
>> +
>> +static int rsi_91x_bt_module_init(void)
>> +{
>> + BT_INFO("%s: BT Module init called\n", __func__);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rsi_91x_bt_module_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + BT_INFO("%s: BT Module exit called\n", __func__);
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(rsi_91x_bt_module_init);
>> +module_exit(rsi_91x_bt_module_exit);
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Redpine Signals Inc");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RSI BT driver");
>> +MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("RSI-BT");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/rsi_hci.h b/drivers/bluetooth/rsi_hci.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6f44231
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/rsi_hci.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +/**
>> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Redpine Signals Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
>> + * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>> + * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>> + *
>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
>> + * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
>> + * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
>> + * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
>> + * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
>> + * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __RSI_HCI_H__
>> +#define __RSI_HCI_H__
>> +
>> +#include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
>> +#include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
>> +#include <linux/rsi_header.h>
>> +#include <net/genetlink.h>
>> +
>> +/* RX frame types */
>> +#define RSI_RESULT_CONFIRM 0x80
>> +#define RSI_BT_PER 0x10
>> +#define RSI_BT_BER 0x11
>> +#define RSI_BT_CW 0x12
>> +
>> +#define RSI_HEADROOM_FOR_BT_HAL 16
>> +
>> +enum bt_fsm_state {
>> + RSI_BT_FSM_DEVICE_NOT_READY = 0,
>> + RSI_BT_FSM_DEVICE_READY,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct rsi_hci_adapter {
>> + void *priv;
>> + struct rsi_proto_ops *proto_ops;
>> + enum bt_fsm_state fsm_state;
>> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
>> +};
>
> If they are btrsi.c specific, they should be in btrsi.c and not in a header
> file.
>
>> +
>> +#define RSI_FRAME_DESC_SIZE 16
>> +
>> +int rsi_hci_attach(void *priv, struct rsi_proto_ops *ops);
>> +void rsi_hci_detach(void *priv);
>> +int rsi_hci_recv_pkt(void *data, u8 *pkt);
>
> And this is the part I do not get. What is the deal with the rsi_bt_ops.
> Having both exported is pointless.
rsi core module initializes rsi_bt_ops by calling exported function
rsi_get_hci_ops().
Regards,
Amitkumar
