Larry Finger <[email protected]> writes:

> On 01/11/2018 01:09 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
>>
>> This commit implement the common function to sort old features, and add
>> more new features that are get_supported_feature, get_supported_version,
>> get_ant_det_val, ble_scan_type, ble_scan_para, bt_dev_info,
>> forbidden_slot_val, afh_map and etc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>

[...]

>> @@ -459,6 +461,19 @@ typedef bool (*bfp_btc_get)(void *btcoexist, u8 
>> get_type, void *out_buf);
>>     typedef  bool (*bfp_btc_set)(void *btcoexist, u8 set_type, void
>> *in_buf);
>>   +typedef u32 (*bfp_btc_get_bt_coex_supported_feature)(void
>> *btcoexist);
>> +
>> +typedef u32 (*bfp_btc_get_bt_coex_supported_version)(void *btcoexist);
>> +
>> +typedef u8 (*bfp_btc_get_ant_det_val_from_bt)(void *btcoexist);
>> +
>> +typedef u8 (*bfp_btc_get_ble_scan_type_from_bt)(void *btcoexist);
>> +
>> +typedef u32 (*bfp_btc_get_ble_scan_para_from_bt)(void *btcoexist, u8 
>> scan_type);
>> +
>> +typedef bool (*bfp_btc_get_bt_afh_map_from_bt)(void *btcoexist, u8 map_type,
>> +                                           u8 *afh_map);
>> +
>>   typedef void (*bfp_btc_set_bt_reg)(void *btc_context, u8 reg_type, u32 
>> offset,
>>                                 u32 value);
>
> I would prefer that you not add additional typedef statements, but I
> will let it pass.

But I can't really take that :( Typedefs are not really liked in
upstream and just makes code harder to read.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Reply via email to