---- "Michał Kazior" <[email protected]> wrote: 
> On 15 June 2018 at 19:23,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ---- [email protected] wrote:
> >> ---- "Michał Kazior" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Your noise floor readout in survey dump is terribly bad for 5GHz. It
> >> > ain't stellar for 2.4GHz either but within reason nonetheless.
> >> >
> >> > Did you try using the card in a different device? I wonder if the
> >> > device you're trying to use it in has some sort of internal noise on
> >> > those frequencies and/or ath9k's ANI isn't able to deal with it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Michał
> >> >
> >> > On 15 June 2018 at 15:31,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I did.
> >> I took it out of the Penguin-Z notebook and put it in a Dell XPS15 9560 
> >> running Windows 10. Only 2.4Ghz networks were visible from there as well. 
> >> Not exactly apples-to-apples, but consistent results.
> 
> This reduces likeliness this is tied to a os/driver issue. Maybe
> calibration data on the device eeprom is broken? Or maybe it's a
> hardware defect?




I have three of these cards all with the same problem, so if it's a hardware 
defect then it's pretty much game over and these cards are all useless.
Forgive my ignorance, but is there any way to check/fix calibration data?




> 
> 
> > Could it be antenna related (in multiple devices)?
> 
> Antennas can be designed to work better on certain frequency ranges. I
> wouldn't expect such a dramatic effect though.
> 
> 
> > On wikidevi.com I see some M.2 cards listed with an antenna connector of 
> > U.FL and others with MHF4. I can't find anything describing the difference, 
> > if any. The connectors seemed to fit OK. Also, what's the deal with 'main' 
> > and 'aux' antenna connectors? I've seen people suggest swapping them has 
> > helped in some cases with poor signal, while others insist that it makes no 
> > difference. I have not tried swapping the connectors.
> 
> I think it's not a connector problem because 2.4GHz scan results
> report reasonable signal strength for found APs (-60dBm). My
> experience is that if you use a wrong (but seemingly fitting)
> connector you'd get near 0 results or below -90dBm across the board.
> 
> 
> Michał

Reply via email to