On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 12:48, Arend van Spriel <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/30/2018 1:52 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > I'm providing extra version info of tested firmware images as requested > > by Arend in another e-mail thread. > > Looking into our firmware repo it there are two flags, ie. WL_MONITOR > and WL_RADIOTAP. It seems both are set for firmware containing -stamon- > feature. Your list below confirms that. I still plan to add indication > for WL_RADIOTAP in the "cap" iovar, but a stamon feature check could be > used for older firmwares.
I just checked wl.mk (it's an open source file) and found following line: WLFILES_SRC_HI += src/wl/sys/wlc_stamon.c not guarded by any ifeq. It appears wlc_stamon.c is always being compiled in. Are you 100% sure that wlc_stamon.c depends & uses radiotap? Are you sure it's impossible to include stamon support without radiotap support? I'm asking because we're going to check "sta_monitor" iovar to find out if radiotap support is included. I'd like to be sure it's 100% reliable.
